What is a randomized controlled trial (RCT)?
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is an experiment in which participants are assigned to an intervention or control group by an unpredictable chance process, and the groups are followed concurrently and compared. According to CONSORT, properly done random allocation eliminates selection bias at entry; blinding limits bias after allocation.
The CONSORT 2025 explanation says that in random allocation each participant’s chance of receiving each intervention is known before assignment, yet the actual allocation is decided by chance and cannot be predicted. The US National Library of Medicine’s definition of the RCT publication type lists at least one test and one control treatment, concurrent enrollment and follow-up of both groups, and treatments chosen by a random process. CONSORT mentions the comparator as either an active treatment or a placebo.
According to CONSORT, randomization rests on two steps: generating an unpredictable allocation sequence and keeping it hidden from the investigators who enroll participants (allocation concealment). When properly implemented, this removes selection bias at entry into the trial. Blinding, or masking, is separate: it withholds the assigned intervention from people who could be influenced by knowing it, such as participants, care providers and outcome assessors, and CONSORT adds that it is not always appropriate or feasible.
CONSORT 2025 states that proper random assignment does not guarantee similar groups at baseline, and that baseline differences are due to chance rather than bias. Trials are reported with the CONSORT 2025 checklist of 30 items plus a participant flow diagram, which supersedes the 2010 version. ICMJE recommends that journals require a trial to be entered in a public registry no later than the first participant’s consent.
Example
In a hypothetical study, patients are split into two groups by a computer-generated random sequence; one group receives a new drug and the other a placebo. Patients and outcome assessors do not know the assignments, and the groups are compared at the end of a set follow-up period.
A point to watch
According to the CONSORT 2025 explanation, methods such as alternating assignment, hospital numbers or birth dates are not random, and authors should describe them precisely instead of calling them “random”. The same document says allocation concealment must not be confused with blinding: concealment protects the sequence up to allocation, blinding protects it afterwards.
Related terms
Guides and tools
Sources
- CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials — BMJ, 2025
- CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials — BMJ, 2025
- MeSH: Randomized Controlled Trial (publication type) — U.S. National Library of Medicine, 2015
- Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals: Clinical Trials (Registration) — ICMJE