KONSİL

Glossary · Study designs

What is a pilot study?

A pilot study is a trial run, at small scale, of the methods and procedures planned for a larger study. Its purpose is to find out whether the approach is feasible, such as recruiting, retaining and measuring participants and delivering the intervention, not to test whether the intervention works.

NCCIH quotes the Dictionary of Epidemiology in defining a pilot study as “a small-scale test of the methods and procedures to be used on a larger scale.” It stresses that the goal is not to test an intervention’s effect but to assess whether the approach is feasible and acceptable: the question is “Can I do this?”, not “Does this work?” In the framework of Eldridge and colleagues, pilot studies form a subset of feasibility studies, in which the future study, or part of it, is run on a smaller scale.

NCCIH’s example questions include whether the target population can be recruited, whether participants stay, and whether the intervention can be delivered as intended. NCCIH recommends quantitative benchmarks set in advance and a sample size based on participant flow, budget and feasibility goals rather than a power calculation. Randomized pilot trials have a 26-item CONSORT extension (Eldridge and colleagues), which does not recommend formal hypothesis testing for effectiveness.

NCCIH holds that an effect size estimated in a pilot study is unstable and gives no useful basis for power calculations; it recommends basing that calculation on a clinically meaningful difference. Thabane and colleagues likewise warn that estimating treatment effects from pilot studies needs caution. Eldridge and colleagues observe that the term is used inconsistently: sometimes “pilot” means a feasibility study, sometimes a small trial of efficacy.

Example

In a hypothetical study, a team planning a large exercise trial first runs a small pilot, recording how many people apply, how many finish the program, and how long the measurement forms take. The team writes down in advance the completion rate that would justify going ahead with the main trial.

A point to watch

NCCIH holds that an effect size estimated in a pilot study is uninterpretable, because it is unknown whether the result is true, a false positive or a false negative. It also calls conclusions that the intervention “works” premature at the pilot stage, because it is not yet known whether the intervention was implemented correctly, and recommends basing the main trial’s sample size on a clinically meaningful difference.

Related terms

Guides and tools

Sources

  1. Pilot Studies: Common Uses and Misuses — NCCIH, National Institutes of Health
  2. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials — BMJ, 2016
  3. Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomised controlled trials: development of a conceptual framework — PLOS ONE, 2016
  4. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how — BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2010
  5. MeSH: Pilot Projects — U.S. National Library of Medicine, 2018