KONSİL

Glossary · Publication and ethics

What is a research ethics committee?

A research ethics committee (REC), also called an institutional review board (IRB) or independent ethics committee (IEC), is an independent body that reviews and approves the protocol of research involving human participants before it begins. Its purpose is to protect participants' rights, safety and well-being.

Under the 2024 Declaration of Helsinki (paragraph 23), the protocol must be submitted to the concerned committee for consideration, comment, guidance and approval before the research begins. The committee must be transparent, independent of the researcher, the sponsor and other undue influence, adequately resourced and qualified, and include at least one member of the general public. It can monitor ongoing research, recommend changes, withdraw approval or suspend the study, and no protocol amendment may be made without its approval.

CIOMS (2016) asks that all proposals for health-related research involving humans go to a committee, which decides whether the study qualifies for ethical review and assesses its ethical acceptability; an exemption depends on the nature of the research and applicable law. Review looks at, among other things, the design, risk minimization, the balance of risks and benefits, and feasibility. CIOMS says payment must never be offered or accepted to obtain a committee’s approval.

The legal status, composition and operation of committees differ between countries (ICH E6(R3)), so this page describes international norms rather than local rules. The ICMJE expects authors to have sought approval from an independent local, regional or national review body and to document it when editors ask.

Example

In a hypothetical study, a researcher plans to review a hospital’s past imaging records. The protocol goes to the committee before any data are collected, and a later change to the inclusion criteria goes back to the committee for approval.

A point to watch

Under CIOMS it is the committee, not the researcher, that decides whether a proposal qualifies for ethical review: all proposals for health-related research involving humans go to a committee, with any exemption depending on the nature of the research and applicable law; the Declaration of Helsinki also makes secondary research on stored data subject to committee approval when consent is impossible or impracticable.

Related terms

Guides and tools

Sources

  1. WMA Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Participants (2024 revision), paragraphs 23 and 32 — World Medical Association, 2024
  2. International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans (CIOMS, 4th ed.), Guideline 23 — CIOMS (with WHO), 2016
  3. ICH E6(R3) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice, glossary: IRB/IEC — ICH, 2025
  4. ICMJE Recommendations II.E Protection of Research Participants — ICMJE